10/26/2021 0 Comments Darkvoice 336Se Reviews
Monoprice Pure Tube Stereo Amplifier with Bluetooth LineDarkvoice 336SE - Reviews Headphone Reviews and To. Rolls Bellari PA550 Preamplifier with RIAA Phono Preamp Headphone Amp.129.00.Free shipping. DarkVoice 336SE Tube Headphone Amp/PreAmap DarkVoice 336SE Headphone Tube Amplifier OTL Professional Headphone Amplifier.289.99.Free shipping.Well, when Drop offered the Darkvoice at $185 on the most recent drop, I snagged one. In other words, does this little tube buffer give a listener an accurate representation of tube sound? If so, it gets a user into the tube world for much less money than a Darkvoice AND leaves that user with a pure solid state option while still staying firmly in the budget realm. After hearing from a variety of sources, including that the Darkvoice 336SE was the budget-ish standard bearer for what tube amplification should sound like (which is not saying it’s the BEST tube amp, just a good example of tubey-ness), I started getting really curious if this little tube buffer offered a true taste of tube. I know that the Schiit has a 5 year parts and labor warranty and they are local to me but I want to get what sounds best.I’m still new-ish to the tube world, but bought one of those cheap Chinese tube buffers back in August 2019 along with upgraded tubes and was really impressed with the results.We use cookies and similar tools to enhance your shopping experience, to provide our services, understand how customers use our services so we can. Select Your Cookie Preferences. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. I’ve even had a chance to try some different tubes!Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for DarkVoice 336SE Headphone Tube Amplifier at Amazon.com.
Darkvoice 336Se Reviews Bluetooth LineDarkvoice 336SEWhat are the sonic differences between a tube buffer and the Darkvoice 336SE, if any?Notice I intentionally did not use the word “better” here. Only issue that when you scroll through songs on your playlists it lags a fair bit.REVIEWS: Here is a great review from Unbox. Overall very happy with it. Do these little Chinese tube buffers give a true tube flavor to the sound?Great DAP. I own quite a few headphone amplifiers, both solid state and valve, and my solid state Musical Fidelity M1 PAP headphone amp is a more rhythmically. The tube buffer also had greater frequency extension in both directions, almost always providing more sub-bass impact. The tube buffer arguably did more “tubing” of the sound by smoothing out, but not removing or losing, those subtle details. In general, the Darkvoice with the tubes listed below had more midrange detail and clarity resolving the reverb on things like vocals, acoustic guitars, and pianos with more definition. The answers to Question 2 are that there are several subtle differences. The tube buffer, as compared to the Darkvoice, did inject a legitimate tubeyness into the music. Douk Audio Dz Tube “Preamplifier” (really buffer) under Nobsound branding: and with GE JAN 5654W tubes: There were 3 “layers” of testing. Darkvoice 336 SE headphone amp with Tung-Sol 6SN7GTB pre tube and RCA 7613 power tube. Fair warning, you may be reading for awhile… Or, you can scroll down to my discussion section where I talk about my recommendations for what potential users might think about if they’re looking to try tubes and are on a budget. ![]() I don’t have fancy measuring equipment for this, so I did my best by ear. I also did my best to level-match in all circumstances. For all testing I left those controls at the 12 o’clock positions. The tube buffer here has tone controls. In the case of the hybrid test, the same method was used except I used the Atom’s input switch to switch between the DV preout and buffer signals. Best ffxiv namesWhen going from solid state to either of these two tube options, the sonic spaces between left and center and right and center fill in. The biggest change is on the 6XX, followed by the DT880. When compared to pure solid state, namely the Atom and the SMSL SP200, both the DV and buffer fill out the soundstage and tighten up the imaging. And here’s why…Both tube solutions - even in hybrid mode with the DV - introduced a “holographic” effect to the spatial presentation. The songs I used will be listed at the very end for those curious, as well as what I was listening for with those tracks.Answer to Question 1: YES. The 6XX again, not surprisingly, benefitted the most from this extension and demonstrated the largest magnitude of bass increase. To my ear, this extended to the lower mids, causing vocals to sound more natural and less honky or shouty than on solid state amplification. Again, this happened to varying degrees depending on headphone and amp and combination, but the point is again both tube solutions provided a deeper, richer, fuller low end than solid state. Since this “holographic” nature is often associated with the “tube sound”, we have a feather in the cap of the buffer for doing tube things.Both tube solutions consistently “warmed” the sound and increased bass extension. This filling-in happened to varying degrees by headphone and then by headphone + amp combination, with no consistent “winner” here, but the point is they both did it. I thus claim the tube buffer does give “the tube sound.”Question 2: What are the sonic differences between the DV and the Tube Buffer?First the caveats. Check, check, and check for both the Darkvoice and the little tube buffer. Feather in the cap 3 for the buffer doing tube things.From my understanding, these are the 3 draws to the tube sound in the audiophile community: a more holographic spatial presentation, a warmer sound, and a more relaxed sound. They both tended to blend sounds together a bit more than SS. They both sounded less sharp and defined when compared to solid state. Solid state sounded “exacting” in comparison. Darkvoice 336Se Reviews Driver Tube AndThe tube buffer did too, but there was less distinction between the pluck and the vibration. Guitar string plucks came with the sound of the pluck plus the sound of the vibration. The DV did a good job of combining solid-state-like resolution with tube-like warmth and character. With that said, on with it…In general the Darkvoice with the Tung-Sol driver tube and RCA power tube sounded more resolving than the tube buffer + Atom. I don’t think these tube rollings change the answer to question 1, but they likely will change the answer to this question more significantly. The differences I’m about to describe will likely change with different tubes, and the stock solutions are likely to be different too. To me, that’s detail - having something the other is lacking. I really never noticed that the DV could reproduce something the buffer couldn’t. Both tube devices reproduced the same sounds. I’m avoiding using the word “detail” here because I think to say that one is more detailed than the other is misleading. Darkvoice 336Se Reviews Drivers Returned ToThe buffer had longer decays to the sounds. The drivers returned to their initial positions just a bit quicker. The DV had a “faster” sound. I think in audiophile terms this would be described as “fast”. The different sounds blended together more. This difference was most apparent on the DT880. That is not to say the bass was sloppy or uncontrolled, just that there was more of it than the DV produced. Simply put, the buffer hit deeper, harder, and rumbled more. As consistent as the slight difference in resolution was, the tube buffer routinely added sub-bass that the DV couldn’t match. I really only noticed the differences in decay length for about the first 10-20 seconds a song played the second time through.The tube buffer produced more bass and treble extension than the DV, and added more oomph to the bass. This difference was subtle, though. In the treble the buffer was more extended. Arguably the DV’s bass was more powerful down to about 60 Hz on the 6XX, but then the buffer really brought the sub-bass out more. The difference was less on the 6XX. The DV definitely added bass extension to the DT880’s sound, but could not match the output level the buffer + Atom could manage. Tinto bras filmovi sa prevodomI think the DV also extended the 6XX’s treble response beyond its solid state performance, but not as much as the tube buffer. The 6XX though had a bit more sparkle with the buffer. The Darkvoice almost never sounded sibilant with the DT880s. On the DT880, that could still inject some sibilance back into the sound.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTara ArchivesCategories |